Section 278 Letter of Administration, three daughters and two sons who survived the execution of the case to be considered by the court were liable (one of the deceased's son) for approval of the letter of administration in respect of immovable property. The appellant (the second victim's son) filed an objection against the administration's letter of approval to the administration on the basis that the immovable property was allotted to him. That he spent a great deal of money on property maintenance and the marriage of his three sisters. The respondent has already taken his share of the property from the appellant's estate, while considering the issuance of the letter of administration, the court will only settle questions about the deceased's remaining assets and inheritance through legal inheritance. The appellant is free to benefit from any treatment available under it. To recover his complaint, namely the law, but in any case, under the Succession Act, 1925, he should have raised such claims otherwise the appellant would have no right to prove his claims. Evidence or document was not submitted. Excluded accordingly
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
