Sections 302 (b), 148 and 149 of the murder and aggravated evidence of deadly weapons were prosecuted for the failure of the molecular account weapon to be prosecuted and the trial court sentenced to 25 years in prison on the charge of murder. The accused had demanded from the court that no recovery was made. The legality of it was affirmed, that all the prosecution witnesses of the ocular account with regard to the date and time of the case, the location of the incident and the statement of the case, fully supported each other and even made it clear It was also said that the accused along with other co-accused were also shot dead. He was accused of playing a direct role in promoting the murder of the victim and was not charged because the parties know each other with no specific plea for false interference. Neither could he succeed in his capture. In the case of the prosecution there was ample evidence available against the accused regarding the innocence and the trial court did not agree that any kind of illegal movement in the ocular account should be avoided, only to deny the direct evidence. Recovery from the accused's possession was not sufficient. In the criminal case relating to the human body, the recovery of the weapon of crime and can only serve as auxiliary evidence, if in this case other evidence could be found. The prosecution successfully prosecuted the accused through an ocular account, further evidence of which was obtained through medical evidence and the weapon, which, according to each account, did not.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
