HAMID versus LATIFAN
Specific Relief Act 1877 Section 27 Transfer of Property Act (I82 of I82), Section 53 Special performance of contract Contract specific performance of contract against persons claiming title born after the contract Vendor / defendant and subsequent The shopkeepers in their written statements acknowledged that the property was in possession. In the possession of the original seller / claimant, it can be inferred from the fact that the sale was in the possession of the claimant as a result of the sale agreement between the original seller / claimant and the seller / defendant. O, the Transferred Property Act, 1882, thereafter, the defendants themselves acknowledged that the original seller had in fact seized the property in dispute as a result of a sale agreement between the claimant and the seller, the claimant was against the claimant. That not only the specific seller imposed relief against it, the original seller, but also the subsequent claim against the vendors for title to the property, was born after the original contract was signed on them.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Karore Lalisan lawyer