INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES LTD. versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (APPRAISEMENT), CUSTOMS HOUSE, KARACHI
Sections 32 (1) and 156 (1) (14) of the Customs Act 1969 show the applicant a wrong notice on the misinterpretation of the facts while finding the Central Board of Revenue's endorsement found that the applicant was guilty of misrepresentation. Not a Collector's Notice through the Collector After finding out about the validity of the Central Board of Revenue's Board of Revenue, the Customs has once again found that the applicant did not commit a false statement, the only logical conclusion being the result of the Collector's charge The showcase notice issued by the accused will not be given in which the accused has been charged with misunderstanding. With no substance and was found to be unnecessary, the applicant apologized for the same
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Chacklala lawyer
