PAKISTAN INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS versus REGINA INGRID BUTT
Appellants 17 and 24 of the Cantonment Rent Regression Act 1963 claim that the person who filed the eviction request was not properly authorized because the landlord granted him the property did not have such property. The matter was not raised in the cases before or before the rent. The controller cannot be allowed to rise at a later stage in the appeal, as was determined by the tenant by default, order to defend the tenant for non-compliance with the temporary rent order, interruption of appeal Cannot be done
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
