Find a Lawyer

KAMIL versus LATIFAN

Special Relief Act 1877 Section 12 Transfer of Property Act (TV 1879), Section 573 Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), OX, R 8 and OXVII, R 3 Deferred for non-production hearing next date for proof Effective procedure should be followed by the court where the court acted under the provisions of OXVII, R 3, CPC, then the decision OXVII, R 3 or O IX, R 8, CPC trial on the issue of possession. The court's finding showed that since the plaintiff did not step into the witnessroom or present his witnesses, the matter was answered as not a written statement, on the contrary, Yes The land was handed over to the land. The plaintiff also admitted in his written statement that the landlord had taken possession of the plaintiff and that he was a horse on the ground whose questions were in fact the original contract as well as the entry in both of his written statements. Included. The NDO and its subsequent shopkeepers presented a case of possession as proved in favor of the claimant and its rights were protected under the provisions of Section 33A, Transfer of Property Act 828282 of. The record was set aside, and remand was obtained after a new verdict was made to record the evidence of the deceased at trial and according to the evidence on record. online advocate from Chunian lawyer