Section 5 (2) of the Anti-Corruption Prevention Act, 1947 (XLV of 1860), the required copy of the Section 161 document was delivered to the complainant several days before the raid and such as the receipt of illegal clearance by the accused The question does not arise as to the fact that the raiding party did not see the tainted money passing through and no dialogue was heard between the complainant and the accused, the suspect against whom the accused was acquitted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.