Find a Lawyer

TAHIRA SHAUKAT versus STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 498 Offense Hood (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Sections 10 and 13 of the Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 292 Motion Picture Ordinance (XLII of 1979), Section 18 Pre-arrest bail, Grant's first statement of the accused cannot be said to be a confession in the eyes of the law, because it was more excusable in nature than his confession of guilt, even though the statement made by the magistrate was legal. Was recorded without damaging its legal value without witnessing the status quo. The confession, even otherwise, was of a general nature and was committed by an accused of sexual immorality or illicit intercourse, or money received from that person or sent by the accused under that person's money. Date, time and name were not disclosed. Thus Section 13 of the 1979 Ordinance VII was made against the accused. No direct evidence was available on the police file to link the accused under Section 10 of the 1979 Ordinance VII. It appears that the police had granted pre-arrest bail for the accused accused because of malicious involvement in the case. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Mangal Sada lawyer