MUHAMMAD SADIQ SHAH versus NASEEM AKHTAR
Section 13 and 15 Law Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 118 A word about any non-payment of rent by a tenant to a witness presented by the landlord to prove a mistake in paying the rent. He did not even say when he appeared as his own witness. , Discharged that he regularly paid rent, the burden of proof could be passed on to the tenant, the landlord entered the witness room saying that the tenant was not paid by the tenant, The landlord said that the rent cannot be treated as an alternative to non-payment. Evidence, however, that both parties, carrying the burden of proof, did not present any evidence regarding the landlord's defamatory, tenant misrepresentation statement, which permanently paid the landlord a tent, did not reject it. Could go It was rightly concluded that the appeal of the default exception did not contradict the decision of the court, the appeal could not be accepted and the decision of the lower hearing was set aside and the restoration of the controller on rent. Was done
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Sialkot lawyer