Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus PHILIP JAVED

Article 15 and 21 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Jurisdiction High Court jurisdiction The conclusions entered by the courts, especially in such matters under the rules of rent, may not be disturbed by the High Court except in its constitutional jurisdiction. In extraordinary circumstances. The record recorded by the courts was erroneous or the wrong jurisdiction was wrong in any jurisdiction and the decision was reversed. In such cases, the constitutional jurisdiction cannot be formally prosecuted or appealed. Or may not be used as a replacement, otherwise there was no cure. Provided by law

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014

• MOHAN v. Mrs. MUHAMMAD YOUNUS BHOJAN 2014 MLD 288
• MUHAMMAD NASEEM AHMAD v. Mst. SHAMA KHATOON 2014 PLD 290
• FIRST DAWOOD INVESTMENT BANK LIMITED v. HOUSE BUILDING FINANCE CORPORATION LIMITED 2014 CLD 292
• Mrs. SHABANA ANJUM v. MUHAMMAD GULZAR 2014 PLD 295
• ABDUL AZIZ v. MUHAMMAD NASIR 2014 YLR 298
• PIZZA PIPER v. SINDH LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL 2014 PLC 300
• MUHAMMAD USMAN v. MUHAMMAD NASEEM 2014 PLD 302
• GHULAM MUHAMMAD v. State 2014 YLR 303

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2014 →

immigration advocates email from Kot Ghulam Mohd lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes