Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD UMER versus MUHAMMAD QASIM

O XLI, R 27 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Additional evidence was not allowed by the High Court to produce additional evidence, on the ground that the plaintiff failed to order the Land Commissioner under which it restored. What was the possession of the plaintiffs, the possession of the disputed land: The Land Commissioner's order could not be brought to the trial court's file as the same was being investigated before the Land Commissioner and only after the matter was decided by him. The order was approved on that date. During the trial, the Supreme Court turned the application over to the appeal and sent the case to the trial court, along with the case filed by the defendant against the plaintiff, to decide the matter, and the evidence sought by the plaintiff and any For the proof of other evidence, if necessary advocate from Kabir Wala lawyer