Find a Lawyer

MUKHTAR PIPE COMPANY versus AHSAN TAJA

Article 135 Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the West Pakistan Civil Rent Restriction Ordinance 1959, Article 185 (3) dismissed the landlord's son's request for eviction because of the landlord's personal need. An application was filed claiming that the store was verbally gifted. The son's request was granted to him and for his own needs as well, and his decision was upheld until the leave of the High Court allowing the appeal to be examined for this argument. Was. In the overall context of the litigation, it will be clear that the father first sought to remove the tenant from his rent and upon failure, his son filed for eviction request that his shop be questioned. Donated by verbal gift and nonetheless. In the same building he had another shop where he was doing business, he still wants the shop and also wants to consider that the landlord was not entitled to relief under the law which was intended to protect the tenants and the house. The owner should not have been mechanized. Let it succeed tax advocates from Chiniot lawyer