ZULFIQAR ALI versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL, AE & WM, SINDH
5 5 Termination of Services Appellant / Services were terminated because they had submitted forged documents in support of their eligibility. Appellant challenged his dismissal order when the selection committee's original forgery eligibility. On the confirmation of the documents, the appellant vehemently denied the fraud. Evidence for recording the notice ? Evidence on the notice record shows that the documents that were allegedly produced by the appellant at the time of their appointment did not conform to the original documents in relation to their eligibility when the appointment was made. Even when the Appellants appeared before the Departmental Selection Committee to regularize, they could not prove that they had the requisite qualification even though there was no evidence for alleged fraud by them. Voters lacked the required qualifications, so if their dismissal was not proven, no intervention would be required. Cry was not. The term tion w
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
