Find a Lawyer

ASHFAQ HUSSAIN versus PROVINCE OF SINDH

Section 4 Sindh Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Manual, 1973, R 4 Compulsory retirement appeal was not pressed on the merits and specifications, but rather was made to reduce prayer, mandatory retirement, ie fine on appellant facts and case circumstances. The loss is either due to accumulation that the government or anyone else has given the country due to a mistake or alleged commission action by the appellant and if the appellant has committed any wrong, it was of a technical nature which There was essentially a very fine retirement inquiry report in which it was shown that the appellant was suing The charges are related. Appellant was quick to disobey certain rules and to disobey certain orders, but allegedly acted with good faith, in which case the applicant's rules were not implemented And some departmental instructions cannot be justified. Appellant's mandatory retirement penalty claims that his total service serial carrier female advocates from Mamu kunjan lawyer