MUHAMMAD ZAMAN KHAN versus MUHAMMAD RAMZAN KHAN
Martial Law Regulation 1972 No. 115 Para 25 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Applicants contend that the record of the High Court was wrong, they pointed out that the High Court in its judgment stated that Patwari's statement Accordingly, the cultivation of the land was different from the land disputed by the shopkeepers, while in fact Patwari had said something else and admitted that the applicants / shopkeepers were the tenants of the suit land which appealed further examination. Holidays are required.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Khanqah Dogran lawyer
