Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

ZAFAR ALAM versus MEMBER (REVENUE) BOARD


Civil Procedure Code Order VII, R 11 (b) of the CPC Plaintiff VII, petitioner held that the case of the respondents of Siddiq Khan (PLD 1984 SC 289) should not have been appropriate because under O VII. Its plaintiff was rejected. R 11 (b), the initial duty of the CPC, no doubt, was the determination of the court fees and the determination of the plaintiff, but if the plaintiff had fixed postage stamps that were reduced in value, correct It was the duty of the court to determine the price and the claimant was entitled as a chance to meet the reduction in court fees.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Kohat lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.