VENUS DISTRIBUTORS (PVT.) LTD. versus ABDULLAH HANIF
Article 129 (e) Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 100 Second Appeal Recovery Judicial and Governmental Procedures for the Recovery of Money By the two courts listed under the lawsuit filed by the plaintiff in fact by the trial court, The decision was made in favor of. Through the plaintiff, the lower appellate court had submitted that the trial court had not heard them before hearing the verdict in favor of the plaintiff. According to the law, the concept of right was attached under Article 129 (e) of the Kalan Shahadat 1984, nothing was brought to the court on record. To show that the defendant had not been heard, even the defendant or his lawyer's affidavit had not been entered into such a case, the plaintiff proved his case on the basis of solid evidence on record and the trial. The court directed the plaintiff to pay the suit to the plaintiff, thus finding the trial court. The lower appellate court upheld it and could not be bothered unless it was shown that these investigations were contrary to the evidence on record so the second time under the terms of section 100, the CPC was missing. Refused to interfere with the decisions and the orders passed by the two courts, because the defendant failed to identify any illegality or weakness in them, the second appeal was dismissed in the circumstances.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
