A VII, R 11, O II, R 2 & O XXIII, R 1 Demarcation Act (IX of 1908), Arts 91 and 113 The dismissal of a previous suit claiming to have a fresh suit was alleged by the defendant's rejection Earlier the case was withdrawn. The action for filing a business unconditionally and withholding a fresh case from the plaintiff commenced on the day that the alleged agreement between the parties was reached and refused to comply. The plaintiff requested the compliance of the agreement between the parties at the time of the return of the previous trial, the extent to which Article 91 of the three year Act 1908 would not apply in the present case as the plaintiff on the issue of public notice. The facts were entitled to present the facts. In a previous lawsuit between the parties the ad was filed to enforce the settlement, before the lawsuit was filed for sale and process cancellation announcements and cancellations, however, because of the settlement the plaintiff denied such settlement. A new cause of action was presented in which the plaintiff did not relinquish any case. O VII, Rule 11, the application for property filed under CPC was dismissed accordingly.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
