Find a Lawyer

AYAZ AN MEMON versus CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH

R10 seniority appellant challenged respondent's seniority in grade 19, saying that he later joined grade 18 but after that appellant was added to grade 18 through direct recruitment and did not qualify for development. There were seven till the date of the selection board meeting. After years of service in Grade 18, respondents stated that the Board also faced legal defects in the case of Appellant for development in Grade 19, its appeal included questions related to Appellant's fitness, The jurisdiction was barred from appealing. Do not attempt to provoke the matter with the department at the appropriate time and do not seek the departmental remedies which were necessary supplies before the jurisdiction of the service tribunal's appeal, which was excluded under the circumstances. list of advocates from Tando Adam lawyer