GHULAM RASOOL SHAH versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE
Section 7 Police Rules, 1934, Rr 12 2 and 13 5 Notice of the Overshow Show Appellant was accused of unlawfully agreeing and was subsequently returned to the person who challenged him. Not only was he placed under suspension but eventually was fined a modest fine. A one-month salary reversal could not be challenged if the appellant was prosecuted and had not acted before, the appellant was properly punished for unlawful pleading, The appellant was further convicted by the motion, which was disqualified for inspector police. Illegal pleasure was allegedly shared with the appellant and was punished as if the appellant was somehow restored to his original status; thus, he could not be treated differently and This rebellion cannot be allowed to continue.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Kallur Kot lawyer