LILARAM versus GHULAM ALI
The leave to appeal the Civil Procedure Code Order XXI, XXI, R 22 and Section 50 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the CPC Decree and Order was allowed to consider other questions. Whether the High Court was at fault or not? Saying that the application for execution, which was dismissed on 4 11 1976, was number 3 of 1951 and not application number 9A of 1958, when it was a recognized position that hanging application number 3 of 1951 was 1955. Was excluded and, in the absence of notice read with Section 50, CPC, under OXXI, R 22, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the execution of the decree passed against the accused The order can be prosecuted against the legal representative of the applicant.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Darya Khan lawyer
