MUHAMMAD GUL versus THE STATE
Sections 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the Explosives Act 1908 (XLV of 1860), definitions of Sections 302, 307, 436 and 109 The delay in recording a criminal confession was not fatal, independent and reliable evidence. The judicial confessions, which proved the suspect's identity, were recovered, were consistent with the voluntary and prosecution case, and the testimony of those persons confirmed the persons from whom the explosives were recovered at the scene. And who was falsely accused and did not have personal evidence to the contrary. The confession given below was also provided in the offense, the courts had properly reviewed the evidence on record and no weakness was found in the nature of the petition sought by the Supreme Court, but the appeals were dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Panjan Kisan lawyer