Article D 46 Declaration of Dying The jurisdiction itself was not a strong piece of a death declaration that was not being examined by the investigator. The court should always insist on safe, secure and stable evidence for the belief or belief of the deceased declaration. The declaration of death from the transfer of justice stood on the same evidence as any other piece of evidence, and had to be decided in light of the circumstances surrounding it. And in criminal cases, there is no absolute rule of law regarding the principles of definition of evidence. Or even the death sentence cannot be the sole basis for a sentence unless it is reformed. Each case must be decided on its own facts in which the death was announced. It was true and genuine that the court had to consider various circumstances to test the credibility of the deceased declaration, such as the opportunity to observe the deceased's death; the deceased's ability to remember the facts stated was not lost. At the time of making that statement, because of circumstances beyond his control. If he had made several death announcements, then this statement would have been consistent. And whether this statement was made at the earliest opportunity and was not the result of tuition by interested parties, the exact contents of the deceased statement should be substantiated by credible evidence, and therefore by a competent magistrate. The manner in which the deceased recorded the recorded statement would be more weighty than the verbal statement, which could suffer from all the weaknesses of human memory and human character if the court concluded that the deceased declaration
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
