Find a Lawyer

IGI INVESTMENT BANK LIMITED versus ADMORE GAS (PVT.) LTD.

Section 10 (4) of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), section 5 requires a leave application to defend the delay in the application for recovery The defendants therefore filed for leave to avoid each other. Delayed condolences demanded that there be a change. The administration in the defendant's company and that the counsel engaged by the defendant failed to perform his duties in filing the application, was not disclosed in the date and date of the application under which the counsel advised was done. During the late condolences, the applicants had to provide an explanation for everyone who could not have been present in the case. Could not have been held responsible for, delayed the request for condolences, in the circumstances

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014

• ALTAF HUSSAIN v. State 2014 PCrLJ 650
• GUL BAHAR alias GULBO alias ALI GOHAR v. State 2014 YLR 652
• SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY LTD. v. Haji FAIZ MUHAMMAD 2014 MLD 653
• MUHAMMAD RAZZAK v. State 2014 PCrLJ 655
• ABDUL MALIK v. State 2014 YLR 660
• PAK AFGHAN CARGO SERVICE (PVT.) LTD. v. DEPUTY COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS 2014 PTD 661
• GUL ZAMAN v. State 2014 PCrLJ 662
• SHAHBAN BHERI v. State 2014 MLD 663

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2014 →

tax advocates from Saidu Sharif lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes