RUKAN DIN versus TAZEEM AKHTAR
In clauses 7 and 8 of the Muslim Family Law Ordinance 1961, Pakistan (1973), 185 (3) of the 1961 petitioner who was the heir to the original owner of the dispute, claimed that the marriage of the respondents with the son of the original owner. Was not done In order to secure her divorce, the defendant allegedly relinquished her rights to the property owned by the original owner in exchange for her son's marriage with her son Court, and records record After investigation, it was discovered that the marriage had taken place. Neither the property to be relinquished was actually transferred to the respondents nor was it relocated or relinquished, nor can any such interference be removed from the appeal. The request for leave was dismissed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Killa Saifullah lawyer
