Find a Lawyer

DILSHAD versus MUSARAT NAZIR

Sections 7 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 185 ()) affirming the dissolution of marriage by Khulla has been challenged in the constitutional jurisdiction to have petitioners / husband's argument from the High Court petition for appeal. That no guidance should be given to Khulla. The return of the monetary benefits was in favor of the applicant when the High Court agreed that dissolving the marriage route through Khulla was evidence-based and that there was no harm, legal or otherwise. It was observed that if the applicant was so deep, if any, for the return of benefits, he could file a case against the applicant at trial, as the High Court has observed, but he has the right to recover. Like the present, it did not emphasize, at the appropriate stage. The determination of the exact benefits that a wife receives for her return, as can be imagined beneath her dignity, cannot be said for her in the constitutional jurisdiction. C famous supreme court advocate from Silanwala lawyer