MUKHTAR AHMAD versus MUHAMMAD SHAFI
Specific Relief Act 1877 Section 554 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 115 Revised Jurisdiction, Claimant's Claim of Ownership of the Wall in Controversy The question of ownership of the disputed wall is factual, both courts at the same time It was found that the disputed wall was exclusively owned by the plaintiff The defendant was unable to identify the statement of an approved plan or the testimony of a plaintiff who accepted the wall in the dispute, especially the defendant. Was owned by Its witnesses' statements were competent to postpone the order after the controversial wall was completed; any illegal, material misconduct or jurisdictional defect identified in invalid decisions was rejected. had gone.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Kurram Agency lawyer
