MUHAMMAD ISMAIL versus STATE
Pakistan Penal Code Section 376 delayed filing of FIR evidence, delayed two days in filing of FIR, medical examination of prosecutor after 70 hours of incident, witnesses involved in FIR appeared as defense witness and prosecution case. Denied and told that the accused was a fraudulently involved. Although medical evidence stated that the victim had been subjected to rape, the question to consider and to get rid of the nation was whether the accused committed the rape or not. Instead of verifying the prosecution's sole statement, eyewitnesses in the FIR who went out of the controversial mouth, the prosecutor's sole statement on the question of identifying the perpetrator needs co-operation in accordance with the rules for the safe administration of justice and the trial. It would be extremely unsafe to maintain the conviction of the accused during the trial. The benefit of the doubt was overcome under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Sohawa District Daska lawyer