Articles 32 and 34 of the Government Land (Punjab) Act 1912 and the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), the allotment of Ahata, claiming that the respondents were transferred from the original allotment to the respondent's controversial allotment shows. That after the collector canceled the original allotment allotment, the applicants were expelled and then the respondent's record was allotted but the applicant allegedly gave the applicants for the allotment at the time of allotment. Applicants did not apply for an allotment after the capture. They had no locus standi for the allotment dispute in favor of the allotment.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
