PAKISTAN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (PVT.) LTD versus ISHAQUE MIRZA
Pakistan Industrial Development Corporation (dissolution) Ordinance 1984 Section 7 (1) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) dissolution of applicant corporation applicant on dissolution, offered to its employees who serve the corporation's buyer Were not ready for And wishing to leave the service, payment of provident fund and mortgage liabilities that were acceptable to him under the terms of the job respondents, the Constitution petition was accepted by the High Court to the extent that they would be entitled to a salary. Earnings leave for up to eight months and compensation for 180 days, plus the Provident Fund and the grantee who have already received leave to appeal to the applicants. The dispute was about to get involved. Controversial questions regarding the fact of the matter cannot be decided. The parties had no jurisdiction to record their evidence and record it and thus the High Court had no jurisdiction to pass the order, to pay a fixed sum without any proof on the record; that the agreement was a constitutional jurisdiction Not eligible, that is, the respondents were employed on contract basis, the High Court had neither the jurisdiction to retain their constitutional petition nor any money order could be passed, on behalf of the applicants. Such disputes need to be considered further by the Supreme Court. The appeal was thus granted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Utror lawyer