Find a Lawyer

MEHBOOB HUSSAIN SHAH versus MUHAMMAD IQBAL GILANI

West Pakistan Citizens Rent Restriction Ordinance 1959 Section 13 A constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) becomes the landlord / house of the respondent in question by purchase; such respondents on the respondent / tenant have to take notice. Demanded that future rent be paid to him. Did not respond to such notice after which the respondent filed an injunction against him which allowed the dismissal of the applicants up to the High Court level in the constitutional jurisdiction the respondent commenced the execution proceedings. However, the petitioner filed a civil suit in the case claiming that he is the owner of the covered suit. The trial court rejected, but the appellate court remanded the case for judgment on the merit, stopping the execution of the stay, the respondent claimed to have reviewed the execution, the High Court has hanged Setting aside a stay order allowed the appellate court to consider the appeal sentence. The petitioner, as directed by the High Court, only if the applicant had declared the respondents' permission to grant possession was unreasonable and unreasonable and was not a party to the eviction proceedings, so that they were hired by the rent controller. The order was not binding and the conditions imposed for the delivery of possession before the trial were declared invalid. Will require legal consideration attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Digri lawyer