Find a Lawyer

IFTIKHAR AZIZ AHMAD versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN

Prior to the notification on 1912 1979, the provision for selection of the Federal Public Service Commission Ordinance 1977 to include Article 7 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) to include an Army officer in the Civil Service Petitioner / Army Officer. The notification to join the Civil Service was revoked and the applicants believed that the President had added them to public service on a certain date, that he had lost the Luxury Possession and that almost two years after the date of joining the civil servants. Could not be brought, he claimed sanity. The decision of the Service Tribunal, based on a notification on civil tire, and the cancellation of a government-issued notification, were based on well-established assumptions, namely the 1979 omission of the Federal Public Service Commission to the President. Was not authorized, the position on which Army officers were included in the petitioner in 1979 was contradictory to the law at that time, the present president did not have the power at that stage to exempt the law. With the first choice and inclusion of a civil servant, it could not be defended when the latter S, the Federal Public Service Commission Ordinance, the function was also amended its rules in 1977, the Federal Public Service was possible inclusion of the army officers ignored the examination commission. Earlier cancellation of the notification was not possible to the extent that the process of locus poenitentiae as a process of correcting the error. Applicant's agreement in such case between 1979 and 1981 to cancel and remove the invalid order from the scene when you need a advocate from Takhtbai lawyer