MUHAMMAD ASHFAQUDDIN SIDDIQUI versus SIEMENA PAKISTAN ENGINEERING CO. LTD
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 38 (3A) Respondents of the document moved the petition to send the document to a handwriting expert but no order was approved by the Labor Court, either the application was allowed or the same Be dismissed, after the timely record of the evidence, the documents expert ordered to be sent to the presiding officer of the argument, there was no order denying the labor court's request if the presiding officer made the matter during the argument. Documentation from a handwriting expert is essential for fair and equitable decision making Understandably, in the absence of a positive response from the applicants, there was nothing illegal, illegal or wrong to warrant interference by the appellate tribunal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Tando Adam lawyer
