HAZRAT JALAL versus SHABBIR TILES AND CERAMICS LTD
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Service Return Appellant nts Services were terminated by the employer as they jointly served notice of the complaint to the employer and then joint complaint appeals, numbering thirty-one, supported their case. I filed an affidavit, but only a cross-examination was conducted by the employer and after the conclusion of the cross-examination, both parties agreed that in the third case, its cross examination was to be cross-examination. Will be considered at During the cross examination the notice of the original complaint was shown to the appellant in which he admitted that it did not happen that after the signing of any appellant's signature the applicant moved the petition to dismiss the complaint. And the Labor Court dismissed the complaint, the Labor Court had taken the decision a short time ago and would have been in the interest of justice if the appellants were given the opportunity to cross-examine to prove the actions of the owner. The M. Labor Court order of the witness was set aside and after giving the parties an opportunity to present further evidence, A remand for the step hearing was obtained, if any
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates contact from Bhakkar lawyer