Section 22 (l) of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 153, showed that relief work was sought against WAPDA and it was stated - instead of WAPDA as Chairman, WAPDA as Chairman, However, the amendment chairman corrected it. As an integral part of WAPDA and not having separate and independent legal rights, it was not a matter of inclusion or replacement of a party and did not attract the provisions of section 22 (1), the Limitation Act, 1908. What was but Section 153, CPC. In this case, which is applicable to the reform of the proceedings, the court was obliged to make necessary correction in the case.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
