ARIF ALI versus MUHAMMAD RAMZAN
Section 302/34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), the extra-judicial confession of the perpetrators of the accused did not affect the sixth appeal of the conviction and it was rejected by the High Court as to the testimony of the witnesses on the score. The statements could not be relied upon. The recoveries, which were made after a long delay from accessible places for everyone in the house, cannot be used as contentious evidence, so there was no strong evidence available against the accused by the High Court, so this criminal jurisprudence. Was based on principles of principle. There is no need to re-examine the evidence through the Supreme Court leave
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Village Sunder lawyer
