Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD USMAN versus PUNJAB UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC STAFF ASSOCIATION

Allotment of landless persons (Land Settlement) Act 1958 Section 10 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) was not specifically challenged in the constitutional petition in favor of any one applicant (subordinate) even though in the petition A reference exists, accepting the constitutional petition, the court set aside the allotment of all the applicants, including that the contents of the leave petition constitutional application in the name of the deceased applicant show that the late petition The allotment was not specifically challenged in favor of the petitioner, and in addition to the prayer section there was no rail against it. F was not found. It has been specifically claimed that the constitutional petition can only be granted in the circumstances in which it was applied for and relief must be limited to the prayer provided in the constitutional petition. High Court writ by itself cannot issue motive No prayer in constitutional petition for separation of allotment An order was made in favor of the deceased applicant, the High Court was not justified separating Ed from saying that the allotment by The petition for leave of appeal was automatically converted into an appeal by an unclean order of its own, and the order of the High Court was adjourned to the extent that it declared the allotment in favor of the late applicant without legal authority. Had done. pakistani advocates Karore Lalisan lawyer