Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IQBAL versus ASSITANT CHIEF OF NAVAL STAFF

The Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 212 (3) Reversion Petitioner was initially approved for development but the order was reversed and it was reversed; the petitioner was presented with a departmental appeal against his reversal and his It also affirmed a copy of the respondent's appeal under which he had served before joining. The present Establishment Petitioner received a response from his former employer informing him that he was not certified in any grade while serving in this Establishment order, and ordered the cancellation and treatment of the previous employer's letter. No license was maintained before the service tribunal against. It was when the Appellant's Service Appeal was dismissed under the Appellate Order of the Department that the ban on appeal of the holiday Prima was timely, it appears that the applicant's department after joining the present employment. Has confirmed this on appeal. In fact, his previous employer was not guaranteed by law and thus the previous employer could not be treated as a letter of appeal for the purpose of limitation in service appeal. The question is whether the Applicant's Department of Appeal was authorized before its current employer, which should have been decided by the Service Tribunal leave. Appeal was considered whether the service tribunal was entitled to dismiss the applicant's service appeal on the basis of limitation by treating his former employer's letter as an appeal order. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Khair Pur Mir lawyer