Find a Lawyer

MAQBOOL-UR-REHMAN KHAN versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

The High Court allowed the payment of specific costs for filing the latest constitutional application with permission to return the constitutional application of A. XXIII, R1 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (3) and 199 fresh. Allow Appeal Against The Applicant Requested This Manual was a withdrawal request issued by the Revenue Secretary dated 15 2 1988, under which he issued his first order dated 10 12 1977 only by the order of the Revenue Secretary. Was dismissed as provoked and should not have asked for permission to withdraw the constitutional application. Permission to enter a new petition as stated that this order was passed during the approval of the Constitution Petition and it can be challenged in the Constitution Petition but if it is said that this Constitution has been claimed It should be challenged with the first cause of action and relief of the aftermath. It was only necessary with the permission to file a new petition and then it was in the authority of the HC to grant such permission on such terms as it was appropriate that the applicants had already filed the High Court Petition. The latest constitutional application was filed under the order in order to approve the appeal for dismissal under these circumstances. Pakistan, top advocate family court from Kalaswala lawyer