CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR OF AUQAF versus MUHAMMAD JAHANGIR
Article 7 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the West Pakistan Waqf Properties Ordinance 1961, whether or not a dedicated property, the applicant was obliged to prove that the property was owned by the Waqf in dispute. But he failed to prove the fact to the applicants. It is relieved to appeal that the High Court had erred in the law in not allowing the applicant to furnish the documents for the dedication of the property or the establishment of the user as the Waqf Property High Court stated in his inquiry. The passer-by has a chance to present the document, but he fails to take advantage of it. Four years on, and thus it was a claim of delay when it failed to prove its case by its own default, the Supreme Court saw - no reason why it should be allowed at that stage when the relevant provisions. Was limited to any situation. Where documentation was required for the purpose of decision-making
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
