MUHAMMAD AFZAL versus REHMATULLAH
Article 4 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the NWFP Pre-Emission Act, 1950, dismissed the notice before the trial because the case was not sold, the appellate court has said The verdict said that such a transaction was in fact a sale. The High Court affirmed the appellate court's leave to appeal after the documentary and oral evidence were valid, concluding that the transaction in the case was a sale, as reported in the Revenue Record. Due to which the seller appeared before the Revenue Officer who had the transaction. The second reason mentioned as a sale for consideration of a particular amount is that the record by the appellate court is that in section 4 of Act XIV of 1950, the prohibited court had to consider that the issue of intermediary was a sale. In fact, there was no sale in which such a result was accepted by the High Court. Revision, there can be no exception to that which was denied on the record of support and the permission to appeal to legal aircraft under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Fateh Pur lawyer