BUKHTIAR AHMAD versus AGRICULTURAL ENGINEER, AGRICULTURAL WORKSHOP
Section 25 A retrenchment labor court dismissed a complaint challenging a job appellant even before he was re-served twice but was withdrawn each time and on his third return he was recovered. He was not withdrawn although he claimed that his juniors were allegedly withdrawn. In the service, the appellant did not impose his juniors who were withdrawn by the administration and whose interest was at stake when the appellant succeeded in his appeal, no decision can be made as to whether he Whether appellant is senior or junior or has been restored or promoted after appellant's recovery, it is unfair and unjust if the appellant's appeal is removed on the basis of non-practitioners affected by this decision. When the case was done, the case was called for remand to the Labor Court and the appellant was directed to proceed. Individuals, such as the juniors, will not make any decision on the lunar merit of the Labor Court proceedings ceded by it.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
