JAMAL AHMAD KHAN versus HAJIRAN BIBI
Constitutional application did not take effect after the High Court's remand order passed in the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 Constitution Petition, Section 18 (2) of the Evacuation Property and Displaced Persons Act (1975) The fact is that if the name of the respondent was to be canceled in the name of the competitor, he was not obliged by the commissioner of any other settlement to comply with the directions of the High Court in the constitutional petition. In favor of contesting the defendant, there was no ground for failing to comply with the directions of the High Court in the proceedings in which the appellant was not a party. The Supreme Court appointed the High Court decision and its subsequent decision in favor of the respondents approved by the Settlement Authority. The notified officer received a case remand for proceedings on the terms of the High Court-approved remand order in the initial Constitution.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Mian Chunnu lawyer
