Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MASOOD AKHTAR KHAN versus MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE

The Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1913 Section 15 Civil Procedure Code (v. 19 (18), Section 100 Second Appeal Scope Constitution of Pakistan (1973)), Article 185 concludes the concurring findings of the two courts by the High Court of Justice High Court. Prior to the dismissal of the plaintiff, two court inquiries in respect of the factual rights because the courts below do not properly value the evidence presented by the parties were accepted by the appellant's witness, but both Under the courts, the courts also ignored their evidence. Failed to take note of the filing of the report whereby the respondent gave the land to the person for whom he was appearing as a witness himself and thus remained silent on his objection to the conversion of the change. - Extraordinary grounds rejected the evidence of official witnesses who confirmed the conversion advertisements and variations. On the other hand, the competence of the competent plaintiff was based on oral evidence which could hardly be relied upon by the High Court order. And so no intervention was needed. famous high court advocate from Chaininda lawyer