MUHAMMAD KHAN versus ALLAH RAKHA
Punjab Tenancy Act 1887 Section 77 was dismissed by the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), the trial court for the expulsion of 164 tenants and the recovery of the product, but the decision in the appeal case was remanded by the Additional. The suit will be decided simultaneously to recover the product and injection suit, the suit was re-decided in favor of the landlord, the Additional Commissioner again remanded the case with the observation that the court's preliminary injunction in the letter Did not run And in review, the Collector's order regarding the remand order of the remand was already established, which shows that the collector complied with the instructions in the remand order and that both the cases were decided simultaneously. The collector did not issue an order on the same date. Was invalid and the exception was invalid which could not be allowed to stand in the way of transfer The singing justice commissioner erred in saying that his court's preliminary instructions were not followed, material irregularities. In the absence of, the opening of the second door of litigation by remanding the Additional Commissioner to the trial was in no way justified, that the bail order was defective, not durable and was set aside by the Board of Revenue in review.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Chiniot lawyer