WAHEED ASGHAR versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 1212 (3) The dismissal of the observation against the applicants listed by the High Court justification for the constitutional petition in which the observation complaint was dismissed was removed to the extent any positive regarding the applicant's implications. What was being objected to was the observation that was the result of the first impression, the mere inclusion of a mere possibility in the role and nothing more than the High Court could justify at this stage and The opportunity for the applicant to delete remarks in these proceedings could have arisen when there was no positive Teja is exported. This effect was recorded and it was not done, no case was filed against the applicant to remove any remarks, if any, on his own merits and brought before the competent authority. The content had to decide, not on them. Leave the appealing remarks to appeal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Kala Shah Kaku lawyer
