ZAHEER-UD-DIN versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 1212 (3) The right to be included in ad hoc appointment services The appointment of the applicant was ad hoc and not a regular ad hoc condition for the benefit of the government and not for the benefit of the employee. So much so, as he stated, not only was the employee obliged to attend the next competitive exam but if he did not make the grade, his ad hoc appointment could be terminated during the ad hoc appointment. Only on the condition of his appointment to a comfortable vacancy, the right to be satisfied with service that was not immediately available to fill and when the vacancy is available immediately against the vacancy. The employee was appointed. The termination of the employee's ad hoc appointment cannot be objected to, nor can the delay in requesting an vacant vacancy be raised. In spite of public importance, leave to appeal was denied
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Jaja Abasian lawyer
