SHAFQAT ALIAS SHAUKAT JAVAID versus STATE
Appeals against sentencing and revision for the enhancement of the Articles 2 & 2 and 7 ofment sentencing The prosecutor, through the testimony of the complainant's eye and the testimony of two other injured eye, had established a fully ocular account in the presence of which The testimony of such witnesses was in full line. Medical evidence and they successfully resisted the cross-examination and the defense could not obtain anything from them, the recovery of the daggers recovered from the suspects was beyond any doubt, and according to the report by the forensic science laboratory, the dagger was found in human blood. Defendant pleaded guilty to prosecution did not encourage any trust in the prosecution's failure to prove his case, the appeal filed by the defendants against his conviction and conviction was dismissed. , There was no reason to extend the sentence.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Kot Radha Kishan lawyer