SHAHADAT versus STATE
Section 2 302/3434 of the prosecution was substantiated to substantiate the removal of blood-stained clothing from their persons at the time of the recovery and arrest of the blood-stained weapons contained by the accused and the recovery of all such items. The witness confirmed that there was no enmity against the accused. Ocular testimony presented by eye witnesses who had no previous hostility to the accused, confirmed permanent medical evidence and the murder of the victim on the bedside, ocular testimony was confirmed as the wounds on the victims could be replaced. Is when the deceased were lying on the couch and may not have been received if the attacker and the victim of the attackers were facing each other because the accused defense version alleged that the complainant had a Secretly arrived at the suspect's residence and tried to kidnap the accused's daughter and a daughter. It was and on hearing her voice, the daughter was running from her field where she was irrigating her land and killed the victims. The incidents with Kasi that were in her hands cannot be believed because her prescription. No testimony was presented by the eligible area to prove it, nor was the prosecution against the daughter of the accused, who was allegedly abducted, who brought her case. Proved beyond the shadow of a doubt, appeals filed by the appellants against their conviction and conviction, resulting in failure and dismissal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Kohlu lawyer