Find a Lawyer

SABIR versus THE STATE

Section 2 302 // 34 The alleged case was not proved against the accused, the trial court itself concluded that there was no motive for the murder of the accused, which reacted to the prosecution's case. Eyewitnesses who were closely related to the accused were contradictory evidence and their conduct was clear. Noting that such witnesses could not be trusted unless they were present on the spot, could not be confirmed, but there is no such conspiracy being recorded on the record as to the eyewitness testimony. What was not believed in the same can not be believed in relation to the recovery of arms. There was a possibility of two versions of the crime and other things that the version given by the accused could prove to be correct, thus the accused could be accused of not being proved beyond any reasonable doubt. law firms from Killa Saifullah lawyer